Diana and joby wrote the following proofs
Web1.Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Diana's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠4 = 180° Definition … WebJun 12, 2024 · Diana and joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. who is correct? . diana’s proof. statement justification . 1 + 2 = 180° definition of supplementary angles . 1 + 4 = 180° definition of supplementary angles . 1 + 2 = 1 + 4 transitive property of equality . . joby’s proof. statement justification . 2 = 4 …
Diana and joby wrote the following proofs
Did you know?
WebTranscribed image text: Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertica congruent. Who is correct? vertical angles are Diana's Proof Statement 41+ 2 180 … WebDiana's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠2 = ∠1 + ∠4 Transitive Property of Equality Joby's Proof Statement Justification ∠2 = ∠4 Vertical angles are congruent. ∠1 = ∠3 Vertical angles are congruent. Vertical Angles are congruent.
WebOct 5, 2024 · Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct?. . Diana’s Proof. . Statement Justification . 1 + 2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles . 1 + 4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles . 1 + 2 = 1 + 4 Transitive Property of Equality . . . Joby’s Proof. . WebDiana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Image transcription text 2 3 M Diana's Proof Statement Justification 41+ …
WebJun 12, 2024 · Answers: 2 to question: Diana and joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. who is correct? . diana’s proof. statement justification …
WebKelly and Daniel wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Q&A . Use the figure to answer the question that follows: U W S Q R T V Z The two-column proof below describes the statements and reasons for proving that corresponding angles are congruent: ... Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to ...
WebDiana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT intersects line segment MR forming four angles. … impact nyc 100WebJan 28, 2024 · I will supply the proof; you figure what is wrong with the proof given in the problem. Draw a figure!!!! Construct the line segments LK and LJ. In triangles LMJ and LMK: LM is common. JM = LM because LM is the bisector of JK (you might use congruent instead of equal) The 2 triangles are right triangles because LM is the perpendicular bisector of JK impact nw organization adressWebDiana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct?Diana's Proof StatementJustification∠1 + ∠2 = 180°Definition of … list string mybatis foreachWebAmanda and Stephen wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT intersects line segment MR, forming four … list string to arraylistWebQuestion: Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Diana's Proof ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary … list string list new arraylist string 是什么意思WebAn arrow is missing between the given statement and ZINK ~ ZLNJ. Point L is equidistant from points J and N, not J and K. JL and KL are equal in length, according to the definition of a midpoint - This statement is wrong because JL and KL are equal in length because of the definition of congruence, and not definition of midpoint. impact oakvilleWebSep 2, 2024 · Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Diana’s Proof. Statement Justification . 1 + 2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles... impact oakland county